Opinion

Religious Education: A Tug-of-War in Holyrood

Share
Religious Education: A Tug-of-War in Holyrood
Listen to this article

Well, here we are again, eh? Another week, another parliamentary spat that gets right to the heart of what kind of Scotland we want to build. This time, it’s all about our bairns, their schooling, and the ever-present shadow of faith in the classroom. The Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill has just gone through Holyrood, and it’s fair to say it’s stirred up a hornet’s nest, particularly with the Scottish Greens’ involvement.

The bill itself is a bit of a curious beast. It gives children the right to opt *into* religious education, even if their parents aren’t keen. Now, that’s an interesting move, focusing on the child’s agency. But here’s the rub, and where the Greens stepped in: it doesn’t give them a reciprocal right to opt *out* of religious observance if their parents want them to stay in. That seems a bit lopsided to my mind, doesn’t it?

It was the Scottish Greens, bless their cotton socks, who pushed for an amendment. They managed to get a commitment for the next parliament to ‘take steps’ towards giving children an independent right to withdraw from religious observance. After that, they abstained from the final vote, leaving the SNP and Liberal Democrats to see the bill through. It’s a classic Holyrood manoeuvre, isn’t it? Get your bit in, then stand back and let the others get on with it.

Unsurprisingly, this has gone down like a lead balloon with the Catholic Church. The Bishops Conference of Scotland made their feelings crystal clear. They said: “We are deeply concerned by the decision to grant Scottish Ministers the power to introduce regulations that would permit young people to withdraw from religious observance without parental involvement.” They’re arguing that Article 14 of the UNCRC, often cited in these debates, puts a big emphasis on parents’ role in a child’s religious upbringing. They see this as creating a “false divide between children’s rights and parental responsibilities,” and they want future legislation to support families, not undermine them.

Now, I can see their point about parental involvement. Most folk would agree that parents have a primary role in how their kids are brought up, including their faith. But what happens when the bairn starts to think for themselves? When they’re old enough to form their own views, should they be forced to participate in something they don’t believe in, simply because their parents do? That’s where it gets tricky, and it’s a debate that’s been rumbling on in Scotland for years. It touches on deeper questions about Scottish Politics: Power, Policy, and the Path Forward, and how we handle tradition in a modern, pluralistic society.

The Bishops also voiced a much bigger concern, one that’s been a constant undercurrent in Scottish education for decades: the future of denominational schools. They stated: “We remain deeply concerned at the official policy of the Scottish Greens to impose a fully secular model of state education, an approach that would strip away Scotland’s denominational schools entirely.” They’ve pledged to work with the Scottish Government to protect Catholic schools, which, let’s be honest, have been a cornerstone of many communities for generations.

The Scottish Greens, for their part, aren’t shying away from their principles. A spokesperson said: “Our position in principle is for a secular education system where all young people are respected and where they have the space to voluntarily observe their personal faith, whatever that may be.” They even pointed out that co-leader Ross Greer ran a club for young Christians at his high school, showing they’re not against faith itself, but against schools teaching from a single perspective. It’s about choice, they argue, and about creating a neutral space for learning.

However, they also made a crucial acknowledgment, one that speaks to the historical realities of Scotland. The spokesperson added: “However, we also recognise the centuries of discrimination faced by the Catholic community and the need to tackle the systemic anti-Catholic discrimination still prevalent in Scottish society. We do not have plans or proposals to change the status of individual schools or ‘abolish’ any existing schools.” That’s a careful tightrope walk, isn’t it? Acknowledging a historical injustice while pushing for a future that, for some, might feel like another form of erosion.

This is where the debate gets really messy, and deeply Scottish. Our denominational schools, particularly Catholic ones, weren’t just about faith. They were about community, identity, and often, a response to discrimination in a country that, for too long, struggled with sectarian divisions. To simply wave them away without understanding that history would be a mistake. It’s not just about what’s taught in the classroom; it’s about the fabric of our communities and how different groups have found their place here.

I think the Greens’ long-term vision for a secular education system, while perhaps appealing to some, is a huge ask in a country like ours. It’s not just about the Catholic schools; it’s also about the historical ties of the state to the Kirk, even if those ties are largely symbolic now. Untangling all that is a job for more than just one parliament, and it’s bound to spark more fierce debate, especially when you consider the financial pressures on Local Councils Are Running Out of Money: What Happens Next? and the broader implications for public services.

Ultimately, this bill, and the Greens’ amendment, shine a light on a fundamental tension in modern Scotland. How do we balance individual rights, parental responsibilities, the historical role of faith in our society, and the push towards a more inclusive, secular public sphere? It’s a debate that won’t be settled quickly, and I reckon we’ll be hearing a lot more about it as we head towards future elections. It’s about more than just a right to opt out; it’s about what we value as a nation, and who gets to decide that.

Sources: Scottish media reports.

Further reading: Scottish Government: Curriculum for Excellence, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC)